Uros Cirkovic: Yeah, Honda is superior in off-road cause of the pegs and tires. Who cares about the Kawasaki's adjustable suspension, who needs suspension for off-road riding... Paid fckin clip.
NoHumanNoCry: Kawasaki <3
Jeremiah Johnson: What a load of crap
ossa60: in a dirt dual purpose bike one will always choose the one with the better suspensión....the klx.
ossa60: apart from that 600 dólar difference, I'm not convinced that the honda can be any better.
Robert Urban: what a idiotic review, first of all klx250 has fuel injection version for years in Europe. Second of all klx250 is way superior bike for off-road use mostly because far better adjustable suspension. Honda crf250 is for Sunday church riding....
Average Paul: I live in Fullerton, California. Can you street legalize a honda crf 450r? Like, get it registered and put all the stuff like head lights, turn signals, brake lights, and whatknot?
MrJumbolegz: We need to do away with those stupid emission standards. You have these bikes getting close to 70 mpg whereas a hummer or lexus gets like 10-15 and passes the standards. It's bullcrap. These companies really need to add some models to the range, why is there no 350 or 500 enduro? All they do is keep slapping ABS crap on everything and packaging it as a new bike. If I wanted that useless techy crap I'd buy a minivan.
kawasaki fan: honda payed them for this video ha jk , I'm a kawasaki fan, there trying to make kawasaki look bad when its a great bike!
shamrock75: The Honda looks cheap just like their Chinese clones.They can try and style them more like the kawis and ktm but they still have that cheap look I can't get past.Fuel injection is common but unless you can personally tune it isnt a plus for anyone serious about offroad riding,maybe its ok for girls who dont ride much.
Cristian Alpha: "If it aint broke, don't fix it" The KLX hasn't had anything changed in the recent years because it was a superior bike over the Honda. Honda had to reinvent their 250 because it was slacking (But that's just my opinion). I've ridden both, and have had my 09 KLX250S ever since. Still going strong. If I were to buy a new bike I would still consider them both again. Although in regards to the Honda, just the added fuel injection on a smaller bike, and the added fuel gauge wouldn't convince me much.
alexinnitro2: klx250 has fuel injection, but even if it didn't, with a smaller bike like that it would probably be better to have carbs since you can throw a jet kit, exhaust and a better air filter and get better performance.
Morten Christensen: Soo why is it that my klx 250 ....2012 have fuel injektion ?? when this one does not?? It even says on kawasakis home page that it has fuel injektion.
Gashaw Arega: we need to buy 20 FCL and distribute z one wiz automatic transmission. Pls send me your e-mail asap.
jack schitt: Kawi should put FI and match Honda price they got a winner
ms “lalo” argentino: la klx 250s es la mejor del mundo
guy proulx: the fit and finish of honda is way better than kawasaki and the honda reliability is far greater also, fuel economy is also better with honda, therefore honda is a better buy all around, the honda is cheaper to buy, go figure lol
jophet sean amorte: crfl is fuel injection nice for gas saver,but klx is has a speed....but your gas is just a mouthwash...
Broseph Stalin: How well does the CRF or KLX ride at highway speeds? Could I take either of these bikes on the freeway no problem?
2013 Honda CRF250L vs. 2013 Kawasaki KLX250S - Lightweight Dual Sport Comparison5
out of 5