Stu650Zuk: Not bad for being a 350 engine with a 2 valve head vs. a 400 with a 4 valve head and around 7-8 less hp.
AlittleBitOfEverything y: People say there's no way possible a warrior could take a 400ex, that's very incorrect I've raced a stock 400 with my warrior with a fmf and jeted... Then we switched riders and the warrior still won, js
mbnt5807: I have a 2003 warrior and I drag it against my uncles 450r and we launch just about together buy as soon as 3rd gear he just takes off. But the warrior is better through the trails
RidetoLive199: my buddy has a 400ex and i beat him off line and mid range on my warrior. he gets me top end but thts it
JeffyGoneWild: lol fact is yes a 250x can keep up with but in an open field my 6th gear still took @david19952007's 250x lmbo!
roger then: This warrior is 5 speed, old blasters 6 speed. My clutch grabbed halfway through the gear....
Gabriel Osborne: yes its 6 speed also didnt beat him by much
david19952007: the warrior is still heavier so the honda would still win
MrChevy369: Obviously the 400 is faster but the 350 is for trails I have a 2000 400ex my buddy has a 2002 warrior 350 mine has way more power but I would rather ride his on trails.
Daltton Morris: Is the warrior a 6 speed
Bryton Sowers: becuz it has 50cc's makes it better. i think your retarded. the warrior is great for trails not drag racing stupid.
ExcessiveForce82: If theHhonda had a Yamaha motor in it then the Warrior would have won...That comment sounded as stupid as some of you guys! LOL
Tanner Knickelbein: The 350 is not a 400 and its a heavier quad
foxrider903: Of course the 400ex would beat the 350 if there stock...But that was a close race XD
Talbot690: @TuriLT same question!
Simonas Kaubrys: both stock?
Drag-2000 Yamaha warrior 350 vs 2003 Honda 400ex.5
out of 5